11th EORNA Congress Valencia, Spain | 16 - 18 May 2024 ePosters 70 386 Quality Indicators in Perioperative Care Jaroslava Jedlickova1, Erna Micudova2 1University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic, Central operating theatres, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic, 2University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic, Department of Organization and Management, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic Introduction: Quality indicators are an essential element and tool for managing organisations. Their necessity is to set a measurable criterion, which allows comparison with a certain standard, guideline, requirement and shows how far the standard has been achieved. The indicators identify critical phenomena occurring in relation to the activities implemented in the environment at different workplaces. Quality measurement tools should be flexible, customised, reliable and available for monitoring. The output is either taking corrective actions or confirmation of the correctness of the set processes. Research and methodology: The poster is an output of the internal grant “Improving patient safety in perioperative care at Central operating theatres I (COS) in relation to hidden risk factors” of the University Hospital Brno (FN Brno), which was implemented for two years. The aim of the grant was to identify risks related to the use of operating theatres, to establish quality indicators and to verify monitoring of indicators in practice, including the setting and taking corrective actions for the identified deficiencies. To achieve this goal, the researchers used their knowledge and experience in operating theatres. Results: The outcome of the grant is the setting of quality indicators, identification of risks and the development of standard procedures related to perioperative care. The outputs of the grant have been published in the book “Quality and Risk Management in Perioperative Care”, which can be used by management in other healthcare institutions providing perioperative care. Conclusion: In order to achieve a high level of quality of perioperative nursing care, continuous monitoring, measurement and subsequent evaluation of quality indicators that are connected in quality management are necessary. This grant and publication can provide information and guidance to operating theatres management on how to approach this issue. 391 Management of emergency situations in the operating room: a survey of professionals Eva Gavilan Castillo1, Patricia Galan2, Dimelza Osorio3, Myriam de Nadal Clanchet4, Anna Gonzalez Tallada2, Eloy Espin Basany5, Marisol Vega Las Heras1, Carolina Gomez Mohen1, Olga Gabalda Moran1, Maria del Mar Eseverri Rovira1, Marta Castrillo Castellanos1 1Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Surgical Area, Barcelona, Spain, 2Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Anesthesiology, Barcelona, Spain, 3Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Quality unit and clinical practice improvement, Barcelona, Spain, 4Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Anesthesiology, Barcelona, Spain, 5Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Surgery, Barcelona, Spain The response to cardiorespiratory arrest or emergency in the surgical area is time critical. We know that the implementation of rapid response teams with a protocolized organization reduces mortality in these situations. However, translating scientific evidence into practice is often complex. It is recommended to analyze the barriers and assets in each specific case and to involve stakeholders to plan adapted strategies. Objective: To identify and evaluate the perception of the management of emergency situations experienced the knowledge and attitudes of the different professionals involved in the surgical area. Methods: Observational, descriptive exploratory study through a survey of professionals. Variables: sociodemographic, perception of the management of emergency situations experienced, perception of knowledge and attitudes towards the implementation of the team. Instrument: Anonymous questionnaire designed “adhoc” in electronic format using the REDCap application. Results: 88% of the professionals had participated in some situation of these characteristics. 53% strongly or somewhat disagreed that the management of the situations was carried out calmly and only 11% considered that their tasks were clearly defined. 49% of professionals said they did not always feel satisfied with the performance and believe that improvements are needed. 34% of professionals think they have sufficient formal training and 15.8% think it has very good training. In contrast, 49% believe that their training is poor, limited, or moderate (7%; 16%; 26% respectively). Most
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mzc2ODc=