11th EORNA Congress Valencia, Spain | 16 - 18 May 2024 ePosters 56 specific concerns and essential imaging were not checked before skin incision. Furthermore possible equipment problems were not checked before patient left the operating room. Before induction, patient’s identity was checked from the wristband in every case. Before skin incision patient’s identity, procedure and site were checked in all cases. Before patient left the operating room, follow-up care instructions were checked in all cases. Conclusion: Monitoring the use of surgical safety checklist pointed out that multiple significant items were checked with the team. Nevertheless, several items from the original WHO checklist items were not checked. Our additions to the checklist prolonged the protocol. Observation results were presented to the staff. New reduced checklist was done, but due to covid-19-pandemic, testing of the new list was postponed up to fall 2023. References: 1. World Health Organization, Safe Surgery, available: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patientsafety/research/safe-surgery/tool-and-resources. 306 Patient Experiences in Robotic Surgery: A Web of Science Database Review Askeri Çankaya1, Hatice Özsoy2, Meryem Yavuz van Giersbergen3 1Fırat University, Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Surgical Diseases Nursing, Elazığ, Turkey, 2Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Gölhisar Vocational School of Health Services, Burdur, Turkey, 3Ege University, Faculty of Nursing Department of Surgical Diseases Nursing, İzmir, Turkey Background: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery represents a rapidly evolving surgical approach that has witnessed a significant surge in popularity over recent years. Objectives: This study sought to analyze patient experiences in robotic surgery by investigating relevant literature within the Web of Science database. Methods: A meticulous and advanced search was conducted in the Web of Science (WoS) database, utilizing keywords such as “robotic,” “surgery,” and “patient experience.” The collected articles were analyzed using R studio and bibliometric methods. Results: The analysis encompassed 4,966 articles published between 2005 and 2023. Notably, 11 articles were published between 2005 and 2014, whereas 36 articles emerged between 2015 and 2023. Remarkably, each article garnered an average of 35.34 citations, and a total of 360 authors contributed to the 47 published articles, reflecting an average of 7.7 co-authors per article. A comprehensive examination of the articles revealed the utilization of 137 different keywords. Notably, researchers predominantly emphasized keywords such as “quality of life,” “robotic surgery,” “prostatectomy,” “prostate cancer,” “urinary incontinence,” “laparoscopic,” and “patient satisfaction.” Additionally, 25.53% of the articles were published in prestigious journals, including “Journal of Urology,” “Journal of Robotic Surgery,” and “Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques.” In the scrutinized studies, patients expressed satisfaction with the care they received during robotic-assisted surgery, and many of them recommended this approach due to its positive impact on postoperative quality of life and daily activities. Furthermore, patients experienced reduced hospital stays and faster recovery times. Notably, physicians’ development was influenced by patient-reported outcomes, and patients encountered fewer problems related to urinary incontinence and sexual functioning. Conclusion: The literature review highlighted a limited number of studies examining patient experiences in robotic surgery. To enhance our understanding and enhance patient experiences during robotic surgery, further research focused on patient-centered care approaches is warranted.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mzc2ODc=